Weekly Bookmarks (7/3/2011)

  • Review of Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark’s paper bashing constructivism, discovery, and problem-based learning, plus some context and research on the other side.

    tags: learning training pbl constructivism research inquiry

    • Thus Kirschner, Sweller and Clark’s paper is an important reminder for us to not carry Problem Based Learning (PBL) to its extreme. That is, while it has its strengths, learners often need a more direct approach in order to build a solid foundations before being presented with PBL.
    • With the title blaring, “Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work” rather than, “Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work for Novice Learners,” the authors almost seem to ignore that PBL is a necessity in order to promote deeper levels of understanding.
    • The paper relies heavily on Cognitive Load Theory, yet we have to realize that it is still a theory rather than a law.
    • Thus, both the authors and the constructivism movement are guilty of jumping on theories before they are fully understood.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s