Archive for the ‘LMS’ Category

h1

First Experience with Usability Testing

March 11, 2008

As part of our LMS selection process, we’re conducting some small-scale usability testing. We really want to see how much people can figure out in each of these systems without any instructions at all to help determine which system will be most intuitive. We also want to identify specific places where we definitely will need to do training and get a better idea of the trouble spots for users.

Although I’ve read Jakob Nielsen’s Designing Web Usability and other books, this is the first time I’ve had an opportunity to design and conduct any usability testing. It’s definitely been an enlightening experience, so I want to reflect on the process and what I’ve learned in this first round of testing.

Test Design & Process

We are testing about a dozen people total, with everyone on the team conducting some tests. The testers are divided into 4 groups:

  LMS A LMS B
Student Student: LMS A Student: LMS B
Facilitator Facilitator: LMS A Facilitator: LMS B

We also have 2 people who are testing both systems; one in the student role (thanks Mom!) and one as a facilitator. The testers have a pretty wide technical range, although we aren’t including anyone with extremely low technical experience. Partly, that’s because we’re using Adobe Connect to record the actions of most testers, and we need people who can manage multiple programs at once.

For each set of tasks, we have a script with a set of prompts for each task. We tried to have a somewhat logical flow for the tasks. The facilitator testers they grade the assignments right after viewing each type of student work. The tasks are grouped, and every few tasks we’re also asking the testers to rate the overall ease of use for those features. We could have asked it for every task, but we knew we had a lot of tasks to test and wanted to reduce the time.

We used partial mock courses for the tests with dummy accounts and student work provided.

Lessons Learned

In writing the prompts for the facilitator tasks, I realized that this took me much longer than I originally anticipated. Part of the problem was just not having the actual site completed when I was writing the directions; we hadn’t made all the layout and design decisions when I started writing. I also caught myself repeatedly giving too many hints in the prompts. Sometimes I did too much to describe the process of how to do a task, instead of just describing the desired end result and letting the tester figure it out. For example, I might write “Go to Joe Smith’s profile to view his blog and read the post for Activity 6-A-4″ instead of simply “Find and read Joe Smith’s blog post for Activity 6-A-4.”

Although I had tested all of the tasks individually on my own, I hadn’t actually run through the entire test from start to finish. I should have. Today I discovered that I needed to reverse the order of 2 tasks; archiving a discussion prevents the facilitator from being able to grade it. Oops. Fortunately I think I was the only person who conducted tests with that order of directions, so no one else was affected. For the next round of testing though, I definitely need to complete a full walk-through myself.

During the actual testing, I had planned to keep track of the timing for each task. With juggling the task prompts, keeping notes on the tester actions and thought processes, and orally guiding the tester as needed, I just wasn’t able to do that too. Fortunately, I have the recordings to review and determine the timing. With more practice, maybe I’d be able to manage. In the next round of testing, I’ll have one in-person tester (my dear husband was coerced volunteered to help). Since I won’t have a backup recording for that, I’ll probably just have to make him wait between tasks so I can finish my notes.

We’re still a ways from having all the data collected and analyzed, but the testing has already given me ideas about training and places we could improve the interface. If you’re selecting a new LMS, I would highly recommend doing this kind of testing. When you spend so much time working with these systems, it’s easy to be blinded to some of the tricky spots for new users. Even just watching one or two newbies walk through your system for the first time can be really beneficial.

If you’ve done usability testing for an LMS or any e-learning before, I’d love to hear about your experiences. What did you learn about the process?

Technorati Tags: , , ,

h1

LMS Usability Testing

February 6, 2008

We’re down to two options for replacing our LMS, and we’re planning pilots for both of them. The first phase of our testing is going to be a usability test. I’m brainstorming what student tasks could be tested. Keep in mind that these are graduate courses with instructors.

Looking at my list below, is there anything you think I’ve missed? Is there anything I included that I should leave out? Obviously, my list is quite long, and I’m not sure that we’ll really be able to test everything here. How would you prioritize these tasks?

Administrative

  • Log in
  • Find the right course to enter
  • Edit profile
  • Starting point (i.e., if you didn’t have a list of tasks, where would you go first in the course)
  • Check messages/internal email
  • Send message to instructor
  • Check grades
  • Find a specific topic in help info

Course Content

  • Find a specific piece of content (e.g., Module 4, Topic B, Assignment 1)
  • Find the Key Information that supports a specific assignment
  • Navigate from one place in the course to a different one
  • Post & reply on the discussion board
  • Submit an assignment
  • Post to a blog
  • Edit text on the course wiki
  • Join synchronous chat
  • Watch a video/listen to audio
  • Open Flash content
  • Open activity checklists
  • Find & print syllabus
  • Determine the deadline for an assignment
  • Post to small group discussion board

Technorati Tags: , ,

h1

Building Better Moodle Rooms

December 4, 2007

These are my liveblogged notes from the Campus Technology webinar Building better Moodle rooms: Online strategies and best practices. My comments are in italics. Because it’s liveblogged, it’s mostly bullet points and some of it may be unclear. This webinar will be archived and should be available tomorrow; I’ll post the link then. Update: The archived presentation is now available.

Speakers

  • Bob McDonald, Manager of Sales and Client Relations, Moodlerooms
  • Peter Lamothe, Principal Consultant, Harvest Road
  • Stuart Sim, CTO and Chief Architect, Moodlerooms

Underlying pedagogical structure for Moodle:

  • Constructivism
  • Scaffolding
  • Feedback

Step 1: Think Constructivism

  • Theory matters in your design
  • Social constructivism—learning from others
  • Many different avenues for learning: instructor led plus peer interaction

Step 2: Use Scaffolding

  • Context & coaching to involve students in learning
  • Student participation is important
  • Use ADDIE model to determine scaffolding

ADDIE

  • Analyze where your students are now. He’s talking about instructors figuring it out in discussion boards or activities with the live course, not in the design in advance like what we do.
  • Develop (he has the steps of ADDIE in the wrong order): Chunk content into manageable pieces.
    • Book (think of chapters, individual pages, etc.)
    • Glossary
    • Lesson
    • Resources
  • Design: Sequence and Organize
    • Rich content, multiple media types possible
    • Edit view of Moodle, showing how to add and organize content
    • Moodle blocks on the right can have widgets like a calendar, news, show who’s online, etc.
  • Implement: Stay involved in the course
    • Students and teachers learn from each other
    • Discussion
    • Chat
    • Wikis
    • Multiple views for discussions
      • Nested
      • Threaded
      • Flat
    • Discussions can be graded
  • Evaluate
    • Activity logs—what are students clicking on?
    • Gradebook
    • Assessment within specific activities

I’m not really convinced that he was talking about “scaffolding” here. It’s instructional design, certainly, but I didn’t really see that this was about student supports that are gradually removed. Did I miss something here?

Step 3: Provide Feedback

  • Targeted feedback helps you remove scaffolding so students do more on their own
  • Feedback from the community is equally important as feedback from instructors

Harvest Road’s Hive Digital Repository

Storing learning objects for different purposes

  • Personal Learning
  • Organizational
  • Knowledge Management

Content Reuse

  • Single instance of content—no duplication
  • Dynamically deliver to courses
  • Permissions and access more important than DRM

Open standards help “future proof” better than using proprietary systems

This demo includes screenshots in Firefox for Mac, so it clearly works there. Yeah for not being restricted to IE!

  • Version options available
  • Use a URL to link to the LOR—link, not copy content so it’s dynamic
  • Able to find dependent files and bring those in dynamically too

Q&A Session

(Several of the questions weren’t of interest to me, so I didn’t record them all.)

Q: Transitioning from Blackboard or Web CT to Moodle
A: Biggest challenge was changing from content-centric to activity-centric model. Hard to move from idea of presenting content to focusing on interaction.

Q: Can instructors be notified via email when students upload content?
A: Yes, in some modules.

Q: Can content (like for quizzes) be created on the PC and uploaded?
A: Yes, Moodle imports from multiple formats, so there are several ways this can be done.

Q: Will Moodlerooms really host for $1/student/year?
A: Yes, for a minimum of 500 students.

Q: What about synchronous interaction? Moodle seems biased towards asynchronous.
A: Moodle’s chat function is synchronous, and b/c it’s open source it works with others. Uses something called DimDim.

Q: Do we host ourselves or is there a central location?
A: Moodle allows either—depends on what you want and need. Lots of flexibility for how you can own your courses. Even if hosted, you still own your data and can take it elsewhere if you want to leave a specific vendor.

Q: Is Harvest Road a 3rd party vendor selling an add-on?
A: Yes, a third party adding functionality to support and work with Moodle.

Q: Can you display math equations?
A: Yes, Moodle has a math editor.

Q: Now that online learning is reaching millions of learners, what’s going to keep people involved?
A: Interactivity and interaction with community of learners and instructors. Rich opportunities for learning. Collaboration and closeness even though it’s online.

Q: What differentiates a great online instructor from an ordinary one?
A: Two elements:

  1. Learner-centered design
  2. Connecting and communicating with students

Q: Are good classroom instructors always good online instructors, or not always?
A: Online has different requirements, especially within design. Not always.

Q: Are you working on integrating Elluminate and DimDim?
A: Yes, they are—cuts down their own development costs to use existing open source. Better to not start from scratch—use the tools that are already out there.

Moodlerooms is working on ways to integrate just about any synchronous tool, even if they’ve never heard of it. They create adapters to bring it in.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

h1

Blackboard Patent Re-examined

January 26, 2007

Good news today–the Patent Office has agreed to review the overly broad Blackboard patent.

The patent in question, “Internet-based education support system and methods” (U.S. 6988138), grants Blackboard a monopoly on most educational software that differentiates between the roles of teacher and student until the year 2022.

This patent is very far-reaching and could affect open source applications like Moodle as well. I know it will be a year or two before the review process is completed, but I’m glad to at least see the process starting.

Technorati Tags: , , ,