Archive for October, 2009

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/29/2009

October 29, 2009

 

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/26/2009

October 26, 2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/22/2009

October 22, 2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/16/2009

October 16, 2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/15/2009

October 15, 2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/14/2009

October 14, 2009
  • Young people write more than they used to, and they don’t just write when it’s required. The study also found that spelling errors aren’t as much of a problem as they were 20 years ago, now that spell check software is easily accessible.

    tags: writing, web2.0, change, research

    • Today’s kids don’t just write for grades anymore. They write to shake the world. Moreover, they are writing more than any previous generation, ever, in history. They navigate in a bewildering new arena where writers and their audiences have merged.
    • For these students, “Good writing changes something. It doesn’t just sit on the page. It gets up, walks off the page and changes something,” whether it’s a website or a poster for a walkathon.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Course Writer vs Instructional Designer and SME

October 13, 2009

Pam Vreeland, my manager, posted a question in a LinkedIn group that has prompted some great discussion there. She graciously agreed to let me republish her question here, as I’m curious what others think about these two models for course design.

A colleague of mine challenged my thinking recently on course design.

I have always preferred having an instructional designer and a SME work collaboratively to develop online course work. Her position is that a course writer can do the job of both as long as he/she is good at researching the topic. I am not convinced.

Thoughts?

So what do you think? Do both models work? Are there certain situations where you would choose one model over the other?

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/11/2009

October 11, 2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/10/2009

October 10, 2009
  • Great example of why I get so frustrated when I hear people complaining about how terrible it is that students copy and paste content. I’d like to see the teachers and professors stop using uncited content themselves first; I see a lot more problems with people with graduate degrees. This lecturer on effective writing plagiarized content for handouts while simultaneously admonishing students to not plagiarize.

    tags: writing, education, highered, plagiarism

  • Power laws describing how networks and social networking work, some supported by research, some simply observations of human behavior

    tags: networks, socialnetworking, economics

    • Amara’s Law (backstory) states that “we tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.
    • 11. Metcalfe’s Law

      This was the original conception of network effects, whereby the potential value of a network grows exponentially according to its size.

    • The fundamental definition of a network effect is “when a product or service has more value the more that other people have it too.
    • In fact, the Principle of Least Effort notes that they will tend to use the most convenient method, in the least exacting way available, with interaction stopping as soon as minimally acceptable results are achieved. As a result, well-known social scientist Clay Shirky notes that the most “brutally simple” social model often is the most successful one (using Twitter as an example.)
    • Reed’s Law

      Researcher David Reed discovered that the network effect of social systems is much higher than would otherwise be expected, helping to explain the sudden rise of social systems in the latter half of this decade. While adding a social architecture to a piece of software for no specific reason isn’t helpful either, it turns out that in general, software (and indeed, any networked system) is better the more social it is.

    • Reflexivity asserts that social actions can and do in fact influence the fundamental behavior of a social system and that these newly-influenced set of fundamentals can then proceed to change expectations, thus influencing new behavior. The process continues in a self-reinforcing pattern.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

h1

Daily Bookmarks 10/09/2009

October 9, 2009

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,221 other followers